Above: Andrew Barkis, candidate for Thurston County Commission Position #2, talks a lot with his hands during an interview in his office on Tuesday, October 9th.
Andrew Barkis and Why He Wants To Be Our Next County Commissioner
By Janine
Unsoeld
www.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com
For months, one
lone campaign sign for Andrew Barkis on Olympia’s West Bay Drive greeted me
every day as I rode my scooter though town to work. Gaudy looking, yellow, with black, girly-looking
curly-que lettering, the sign says he’s “Honestly Refreshing.”
Running as a
Republican for Thurston County commissioner Position #2, the position currently
held by Commissioner Sandra Romero (D), I didn’t think much of it.
Then, the August
primary garnered Barkis 47% of the vote, against Romero’s 52%, with no other
challengers in the race. For the primary, only voters in that district could
vote for the candidates. In the general, every registered voter in the county
can vote for either candidate.
Since I do not live in that district, I kept
waiting for our corporate and local media to enlighten me on who this person
is, and how and why he managed to get a chunk of the vote. Two months later,
eight local parades and ten debates and forums later, the
campaigns for Thurston County commissioner Positions #1 and #2 and
pressing county issues have still received no coverage or analysis.
So, with the
ballots scheduled to be mailed in a matter of days, I still wondered. Who is
Andrew Barkis?
I called him
up. He said his property management
office was on 4th Ave, near Ralph’s Thriftway and I was welcome to
come on by. We coordinated a time for the next day. That was easy. So, two
blocks up from The Olympian offices, I settled in to meet Barkis and asked him a
few questions.
Barkis, 44,
is physically fit and warmly engaging. Greeting voters at their doors since March, he says he’s covered 75-80
precincts, going to an estimated 15,000 homes. His i-Phone has a pedometer in it.
“It’s super
accurate, it even tells me my elevation and calories burned,” Barkis shows me.
“I’ve personally averaged 15-20 miles a month.
My team has done three times that."
The owner of
Hometown Property Management, a firm he bought in 2004 with a business partner,
Barkis’ company was honored several years ago as one of the top thirty property
management companies in the United States by the National Association of
Residential Property Managers. His company employs 20 people and is recertified
by the organization every two years.
Barkis’ long
list of civic experience includes being a long-time member and former chair of
the Lacey Chamber of Commerce and former president of the Lacey Sunrise Lion’s
Club. An Eagle Scout, Barkis is a long-time Boy Scout troop leader and current chair
of the Boy Scouts of Thurston County. He has two sons, ages 9 and 18, with his
wife Lisa, to whom he’s been married since 1992. Born in Chehalis, he is the
eighth of nine children.
Asked about
his unconventional campaign signs and slogan, Barkis credited his 19 year old
nephew, Austin, a graphic designer. Austin asked him a series of
questions: "What’s your favorite color?
Yellow. What’s your favorite drink? Coke, but I don’t drink it. (The font used
for his signs is actually called the Coke Font.) What words do you hear
described about you? Honest. What would you bring to the position of county
commissioner? I’d refresh the commission, you know, like you refresh a page on
your computer….and so on.”
“I like to
think outside the box. I don’t want to do what others have done. I didn’t want
red, white and blue.”
What made you want to run for county commissioner? What was the
tipping point for you?
“I’ve always
known deep down I’d be in public service, even as a kid. When I was chamber
president, people were always asking me when I was going to run for something.
I was asked several years ago in a meeting with Sam Reed, Kim Wyman and Gary
Alexander. Over breakfast, they asked me what my plans were down the road. They
were encouraging me but at the time I wasn’t ready. Then, about two years ago, watching what was
happening in the county, land use issues, and the budget crisis, it became
apparent there was a need for new leadership. I was asked by several people to
run. After two to three months of investigative work, I met with citizens, law
enforcement, asked a lot of questions, and went on vacation with my wife to
think it over. We came back, and I was
ready.”
Please be more specific about your concerns with “land use issues.”
"The County restarted the process of "updating” the Critical
Areas Ordinance. The revision turned into a complete rewrite of the ordinance.
The land use issues are far reaching. The inability to use your property, to
build and or develop has been severely impacted. I am concerned, as this
affects individual property rights. It affects the agriculture community, the
industrial and business community. The process an individual or business has to
go through to determine if they can use their land is complicated, and very
expensive. The outcome of the process may render your land unusable all in the
name of protecting our environment."
"There are other methods that can achieve balance in protecting our
environment and still allow for the use of your property. The adaptive
management approach is one way that is much more reasonable and has been adopted
by other areas. Thurston County did not look at anything but the most
restrictive in their process and the result is evident in the ordinance as
adopted."
Asked what
his county commissioner campaign was about, Barkis said leadership.
“Leadership
starts at the top – we have fantastic people at the county in roads, the
sheriff’s office, Resource Stewardship, all looking for clarification. My company
is a direct reflection of my leadership. That’s at the core of what I’d bring
to the commission, that private sector leadership and quality. County staff
wants to be empowered to do more. Instead, what do they get? ‘We’re going to
cut you and your position…’ I’m going to
empower them and ask them ‘what can we do?’ They will excel and what comes out
of that is better customer service, for all residents. Now, people feel like
they’re putting out staff when they need answers.”
You’re a Republican. Some people have the opinion that all south county
residents are Republicans, members of S.T.O.P. Thurston County or the Evergreen
Freedom Foundation. Where do you live, and are you a member of S.T.O.P. or the
Freedom Foundation?
“I have
never been to a S.T.O.P. meeting and I’m not a member of the Freedom Foundation.
I’m not a party guy (me: oh, you mean the Republican Party) –
right, a Party guy – although I’ve been a precinct committee officer for the
Republican Party for two years now. I like the grassroots part of that and
meeting tons of people. For the last 13
years, I’ve lived near Lake St. Clair, six miles out from Lacey, in a 1950’s
house, a fixer upper. I grew up in a
house in Chehalis that was built in 1894. I like old houses.”
“About
S.T.O.P., Glen Morgan is a friend.
S.T.O.P. helps people find their voice, the same as Sandra helps people
in Futurewise find their voice. That organization is as radical, or many times
more so, than S.T.O.P. (Romero was a
board member of Futurewise when the organization sued the county in 2008, and
won, because Thurston County was out of compliance with the Growth Management Act).
Socially, I’m a moderate Republican, and a fiscal conservative. I believe in
small government, private enterprise, and I’m an environmentalist in the sense
that I treasure where we live. I’m an avid outdoorsman. We bike, camp, and go
backpacking….There’s nothing radical about me. I’m very principled.”
I asked
Barkis about the sources of his endorsements and financial support.
“I’ve looked at the candidate PDC reports, and compared to the
Democratic Party giving Wolfe and Romero’s campaigns $7,000 each, you’ve received
just $600 from the Thurston County Republicans since the primary. You’ve
received many contributions from individuals, business owners and organizations,
and ranchers, many to the maximum allowed. Please explain.
“The Republicans
aren’t the well-oiled machine that the Democrats are in this county….I have no
agenda. I’m not beholden to the Olympia Master Builders, the Farm Bureau or the
Realtors. They sought me out – it’s an honor to have their endorsements. It
bothers me that I’m being mis-classified – and I’ve never sold real estate. With the Master Builder’s, they asked to
support me in a way that I thought was interesting. They asked if I would be
willing to accept their endorsement and financial support. They represent
painters, builders, carpenters, housing people who are employers in this
county. Why wouldn’t I want their endorsement? So how am I going to work with
them? The same way I do with everyone: find consensus and common ground. Most
of my financial support is from individuals, business owners, and farmers…. I’m
not beholden to anyone – I don’t have that line of 25 organizations expecting
me to go in one direction.”
Asked about
the feelings of south County residents, Barkis said he is happy to have the
endorsement of Rainier Mayor Randy Schleis. “South county mayors feel grossly
underrepresented and have started a mayor’s council. They want to be at the
table….”
He says he
doesn’t think the commissioners should automatically vote like a team. “I keep hearing the commissioners say they’re
a team, ‘we need to be re-elected’…That scares me. A commission should work
together, yes, and demonstrate teamwork, but not operate as a unified voice
without dissention. There are differences of opinion….”
Like the Critical Areas Ordinance and the pocket gopher?
“It’s not
good policy – putting them on the endangered species list is not necessary. There’s
a cost attached to the Critical Areas Ordinance. These are big numbers….it’s a
blanket proposal with no room for negotiation. We have to look at balance. How
about industrial agriculture? We need cooperatives to grow and produce our own
food – that will produce jobs, tax revenues. Let’s go to the people at the Economic Development Council (EDC)
who know these issues the best and go after it!”
I thought the purpose was to list the gopher as an endangered species
so we are not dictated to by the federal government as to what we can or can’t
do here in Thurston County. It was pre-emptive. Isn't that want you want?
"I do not believe
this is the case. I have heard this but the fact remains, they can advocate
along with the community not to have this listed."
Let’s talk about impact fees. Thurston County isn’t collecting
them and the county is growing. How do we pay for this? How should those fees
be determined? And do we really have to believe the Office of Financial
Management and Thurston County Regional Planning projections that x number of
people are going to be moving here within 20 years?
“I look at
those projected numbers and go hmmm…I believe they are put forth to establish
policies and agendas. They use fear tactics that Grandma isn’t going to be able
to get the bus stop because of all the traffic coming and we have to build more
to meet those demands. But developers
are paying. The commissioners lump the Scott Homes, Gemini’s, and John Irwin
Construction’s in all together with the Horizon’s and DR Horton’s. Ask any builder what they have to pay. I
question the current administration’s true purpose of the source of revenue.
When I hear that the developer must pay their “fair share,” where will that
money go? If we’re going to have that
conversation, everyone needs to be at the table. What is reasonable? Here’s
what we need to offset, like roads and parks. You’re killing them collecting it
up front. Why can’t we do it at the time of closing? That would be a mutual
benefit for both the county and the builder.
What about the fees that were put into place in June?
“Let me show
you testimony I gave to the commissioners.”
Barkis digs through his files and produces his remarks made during the
commissioner’s public comment time on June 19th, 2012:
“Thurston County is proposing…to add yet another fee to the myriad
of fees and costs that are already placed upon developers….Is this what is
needed now as we begin to finally see a bit of light after a very dark tough
economic time? As is so often, the cost/benefit approach is overlooked and
replaced by a perceived revenue source….These studies are very clear on the
counties (sic) goal of collecting revenue for developed and undeveloped parks.
It is curious that this becomes the focus now as over the years, especially
during tough economic periods, the parks are the first to be cut out of the
budget….In reviewing the proposals it clearly states ‘several issues must be
addressed in order to determine the need for the validity of such fees…the
benefit of New Parks and Rec. facilities to the new development.’ I believe before
we place yet another burden upon a segment of the population, the commissioners
should look at the overall budget…Impact fees are not the answer, or the
solution…the use of impact fees to dictate where and what type of development
occurs is wrong on every level.”
Barkis
added, “Nothing bothers me more when a government has trouble with their budget
and the first thing they cut is services to seniors and police. What about
parks? The fact of the matter is, we’re
not in good shape. The knee-jerk reaction is to cut expenses, but we need to
look at things we can add. Increase our tax base and revenue stream. We have to
be business friendly, and balance the needs of the environment. What are the
roadblocks? I went to the Economic Development Council's real estate forum recently. We have a great infrastructure, a skilled
work force, the best location, the last remaining land available for
manufacturing. It’s a recipe for success. Why aren’t they here? Regulations. It’s
not easy. We have to change that, first thing.”
What regulations would
you change - barriers to development - to invite businesses to Thurston County?
"I would look at
the Critical Areas Ordinance and begin the process of discovery of how it can
be altered. This is one of the first and biggest "roadblocks" - so
much revolves around this. The permitting process, what and where things
develop. There is much to be learned once in office. The key is listening to
the citizens on what are the areas of hindrance. Learning the workings,
focusing on bringing a customer service attitude into the court house. A culture that realizes who the customer is
and focuses on asking 'how can we be of service.'"
Switching
gears, I asked Barkis about the LOTT Clean Water Alliance and asked his opinion
on their groundwater study to put treated water back into our aquifer.
Barkis said,
“It’s very concerning…I have a concern about what would be in that water, it
getting in our aquifer, and have it come back in a couple years and then we
say, ‘oops…”.
Asked if he thinks LOTT meetings should be televised, he said
yes, but “don’t get me started on LOTT.” (Romero is the county commissioner
representative to the LOTT Alliance.)
Barkis says
he has many issues with LOTT, and believes the organization to be spending too
much money. “There needs to be accountability. Where’s the accountability?”
Barkis reaches for a nearby highlighter pen.
“It’s like
this. I have an office manager who buys our pens. I have what, seven
highlighters in my desk drawer.” Barkis
digs them out. “Do we need more highlighters? No. Turns out we have enough of
them. With LOTT, there appears to be no oversight. They say they got a grant to
do such and such. So what? Grants don’t come from God! They come from the
federal government or the state – bottomline, us. That’s the difference between
a private and public mindset.”
Pressed to go
beyond highlighters, Barkis added:
“When I see the
office complex they have built, the money they have put into the Eastbay Plaza
etc. it is concerning. The dollars they are using are the People's. They keep
increasing the rates. This has a direct effect on individuals, especially
during these tough economic times. The rates are getting to the point where
many can’t afford it. The money collected should be solely for the purpose of
providing the service they were designed to do - process waste water. If money
is needed to improve infrastructure and keep pace with demands on the system,
that is one thing. If money is needed to improve technology to assure the water
being discharged back into the Sound is safe and not impacting an already
fragile ecosystem, then that is warranted. The other expenditures I question.”
“I find it
interesting that we celebrate developing a public space in our community for
families and children to play and splash in a stream created with "reclaimed"
sewage water, but we do not work to clean up Capitol Lake….We have a beautiful
lake in the center of our city that could be enjoyed in the same manner! Just
saying!”
It’s time to
end our interview, and asked him how he has been received overall.
“People are
great. They ask me about my background,
what my priorities are, and lots of questions about land use. We were in Tenino
on Saturday….I’ve been in the South Capitol neighborhood, the Eastside, off
Boulevard, Tumwater… great reception. I’ve had a few doors slammed in my face
and my wife got bit by a dog… it’s tough sometimes, but when it’s all said and
done, I will know we’ve done the best we could do.”
I asked
Barkis where he likes to hike.
“The
Olympics, Hood Canal, Duckabush, Mima Falls, the Bald Hills... I like to ride
my Harley to clear my mind, and ride the back country through Tenino, Yelm,
Rainier, Tenino, Bucoda, cut down through Lewis County, back to Rochester…the
backroads. “
Asked what
he might be reading right now, Barkis said, “Killing Lincoln,” by Bill
O’Reilly. “It’s pretty fascinating….The divisions in
our country were so great. I see similar divisions now in our country and right
here in our county….”
“And,”
reaching to some files surrounding his desk, “these,” plunking down a hefty
stack of binders and red folder issue files. “I’m a quick read, I’m like a
sponge. I feel like I’m getting my Master’s in Commissionership,” Barkis
laughs.
“There’s an
amazing transformation in campaigning. You campaign for a position, particular
roles and responsibilities. Then, there’s a passion and a conviction that
creeps in as you knock on doors and listen to people, a passion that supersedes
the job description. I have a passion
for this county. I can make a difference and it’s huge.”
As of mid-day
on October 12, according to the Thurston County Auditor’s Office, there were
158,100 registered voters in Thurston County, 64,970 registered voters in
Olympia, Lacey and Tumwater, and 5,519 registered voters in the south county
cities of Tenino, Rainier, Yelm and Bucoda.
Regardless
of location, there are voices throughout the county who do not
feel they are being represented.
Andrew
Barkis' is one of them.
Above: At the end of our interview, as the sun starts to go down behind him, Barkis shows off an enlarged copy of an article written about him on February 4, 2007, "Chamber leader knows power of perseverance," by The Olympian's then-business reporter Jim Szymanski.
