Showing posts with label American Disabilities Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Disabilities Act. Show all posts

Monday, July 31, 2017

Seniors Denied Safe Access to Trail System


Above: Residents of The Firs, an independent retirement facility on Lilly Road in Olympia, have quietly worked for over two years to gain safe access from the edge of the facility’s property to the Chehalis Western trail system. Many of the residents use canes, walkers, wheelchairs and motorized scooters. Negotiations between the City of Olympia and property owners of the facility have stalled.


City Neglected to Obtain Right of Way, Property Owner Denies City Access

Ensign Road Neighborhood Pathway Project Received $162,000

Residents May Have Title II American Disabilities Act Case

By Janine Gates
Little Hollywood
A Little Hollywood Land Use Investigation

Residents of The Firs, an independent retirement living facility for seniors at 426 Lilly Road in Olympia, want improved access to a public trail that is so close and yet so far.

For over two years, they have patiently worked with their property management representatives, MBK Senior Living, and the City of Olympia to create safe access to the Chehalis Western trail system trail.

The hazardous connection is from the end of the property’s sidewalk at the end of Ensign Road to a steep, 65 foot dirt path that drops several inches, then dips down into the middle of a drainage ditch, and rises again to meet the trail. Another potential access point is also difficult and blocked by a parking lot curb and a rough lawn.

The Chehalis Western trail system offers 56 miles of paved, uninterrupted trails, allowing access to regional businesses, homes, work, and recreational activities.

On a regular basis, dozens of able-bodied staff and residents, including bicyclists, access the area near The Firs to reach medical offices, the Memorial Clinic, assisted living facilities, St. Peter Hospital, Kaiser Permanente (formerly Group Health), and a nearby apartment complex.

Many seniors who are disabled cannot negotiate the drop from the sidewalk to the dirt path, like Manuel Gutierrez, who is an amputee and uses a motorized wheelchair. He lives in a nearby apartment complex and drives to the edge of the sidewalk to watch others access the trail.

Brave motorized scooter riders access the trail either by driving to the next accessible entry point near Kaiser Permanente to the north, about one fourth of a mile away, or to an asphalt pathway to the south near an apartment complex, the Olympia Crest Apartments, also about one fourth of a mile away.

The intersection of Lilly Road and Martin Way is the second busiest intersection in Thurston County.

Above: As another resident of The Firs drives by on his motorized scooter, Ken Lewis, a resident of The Firs, stands in the middle of the dirt path that leads from a sidewalk with a several inch drop off to the Chehalis Western trail.

Above: City of Olympia councilmember Clark Gilman, center, met with Sherman Beverly, left, and Freeman Stickney, right, and about 20 other residents of The Firs in June to discuss their request for safe access to the Chehalis Western Trail. 

Beverly, a former resident council president at The Firs, is a professor emeritus of Northeastern Illinois University, and has recently published a book. In June, he shared with Gilman that he is nearing his 90th birthday and encounters difficulty accessing the trail.

Residents Petition City for Access

The city approved $162,000 for the Ensign Road neighborhood pathway in 2016 and has been supportive of the residents’ request for access. 

The city prepared to begin work on the project this summer, however, the property owner, Olympia Propco, LLC, denied the city right-of-way, thus blocking the project.

Clark Gilman was chair of the city’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory committee when he first heard about the issue. He is now a council member. 

Gilman and Little Hollywood were recently invited to The Firs to take a look at the steep dirt path and hear the concerns of about 20 residents gathered to discuss the issue. 

Freeman Stickney, a former resident council president at The Firs, spent his career in the Air Force and the National Weather Service.

He says a significant number of the 130 residents at The Firs, including more than half a dozen who use power chairs, would like to use the trail for exercise and enjoyment.

In September of 2015, Stickney, along with residents Sherman Beverly, Jr., and Ken Lewis, presented a petition to the city’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, signed by 85 residents asking the Olympia City Council to include their request for access in its neighborhood pathways program to extend the sidewalk in the 2016 budget.

The petition was acknowledged, and forwarded to the city council for their consideration.

“A few of the residents with power chairs have mentioned to me that they would use the Chehalis Western trail to reach businesses on Martin Way and the South Sound Shopping Center. The old railroad grade is level, and much easier and safer to traverse than Lilly Road,” said Stickney.

“The Firs highlights access to the trail in their advertisements. They have even organized trail walks, weather permitting – for those able bodied!” he added.

Gilman said that while it appears the property owner thinks that space is valuable for possible expansion, he doubted that the city would approve one. The drainage ditch causing the dip in the trail is actually a stormwater retention pond, and a wetland the size of about 10 to 15 acres is located directly adjacent the trail. 

During winter months, at least 12 inches of water is in the ditch, making access to the trail difficult for everyone.

“I think it would be good public relations for MBK Senior Living and The Firs to allow the city access. It’s not taking away anything from them. We could provide a nice bench and plaque on it, letting everyone know that they allowed this to happen. Let’s get this done, especially before it starts raining again,” added resident Mike Flothe.

City Realizes Its Own Oversight to Obtain Right of Way


Records indicate that the city has worked hard for two years, making numerous attempts to contact the appropriate representative for Olympia Propco, LLC, which is based in California, and proactively negotiate for the area.

Through the city’s Site Plan Review Committee, city staff reviewed the area and worked out the requirements needed for approval of the trail development and submitted its pathway design to the property owner.

The city is asking Olympia Propco, LLC to dedicate a 60 foot right-of-way for Ensign Road, as required by a development condition of approval that was apparently never completed, and dedicating roughly 18 feet by 50 feet of pathway right-of-way.

The facility was built in 1984.

The city realized its oversight when residents of The Firs made their petition for access. It has offered the owner a relatively small, but undetermined potential land tax reduction and offered to pay Olympia Propco, LLC a nominal fee of $10,000 for 13,897 square feet to expedite the process.

In 2015, the onsite executive director of The Firs’ property management company, MBK Senior Living, wrote a letter to the city supporting its residents, saying, “An ADA compliant trail access would be greatly appreciated and welcomed to our neighborhood and The Firs.”

Residents of The Firs believe they have a strong case with regard to Title II of the American Disabilities Act (ADA), which covers state and local government activities.

Title II requires that state and local governments give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities such as public education, employment, transportation, recreation, health care, social services, courts, voting, and town meetings.

Lack of access to the trail for those with disabilities covers several of those categories.

A MBK Senior Living representative based in California, Kevin Hanlon, wrote an April 7, 2017 email to city surveyor Ladd Cluff, seemingly extinguishing all hope for the seniors, disabled, and others members of the public from being able to safely access the trail.

“Being a senior community, we are extra cautious and sensitive to anything that could possibly make our property less secure. We’re very concerned a new access trail point might bring in greater activity and create a potentially less safe area. It is our belief at this time, that an access point in this area would not be prudent,” wrote Hanlon.

Cluff responded that that the response was very disappointing.

“The pathway would have a significant positive impact to our community. We will inform the public stakeholders that the pathway project is unable to move forward. Our message will be that the property owners are not willing to grant the public the necessary right-of-way for the pathway. We hope your position changes in the future,” wrote Cluff.

Max Rheinhardt, the new executive director for The Firs, recently addressed residents about the issue and on two occasions, suggested in meetings that the property owner may fence off the area in question for liability reasons.

He had little to say in a brief interview with Little Hollywood, except to say that some residents do not understand the situation.

Ken Lewis, 85, a retired manager of the hospital licensing program under the state department of health, has spearheaded effort for safe access for the past two years.

Lewis is active and regularly walks and bikes the Chehalis Western Trail. His wife is not able to access the trail, and the couple recently decided to move from The Firs to another retirement community that has access to trails.

“Fencing off the area would be horrible, and the worst possible, unintended consequence of our efforts for safe access. I even wrote Olympia Propco, LLC in June about my decision, and I never received a communication back. We gave The Firs notice that we will vacate our apartment with the lack of trail access as the primary reason. They need to know there will be consequences for their failure to resolve this issue,” said Lewis.

Above: Ken Lewis, center, speaks to Councilmember Clark Gilman and residents of The Firs at a meeting in June about the the proposed pathway on Ensign Road.

Ensign Neighborhood Pathway Application Funded

The residents of The Firs are not alone in their desire for access to the trail.

The nearby Olympia Transitional Care and Rehabilitation skilled nursing care facility has over 100 residents and over 130 employees. The facility shares a parking lot with The Firs and the trail is frequently used by its staff and residents throughout the year. 

Its administrator, Ben Jensen, wrote a letter to the city in 2015 in support of The Firs’ resident request for safe access to the trail from Ensign Road.

Coincidentally, and unbeknownst to the residents of The Firs at the time, a neighborhood pathway application to the city had been independently written and submitted in mid-2015 by Keith Edgerton, on behalf of the Woodland Trail Greenway Association.

Edgerton works across the street from The Firs as Providence St. Peter Hospital’s Sustainability Coordinator.

St. Peter Hospital is the largest private employer in Thurston County and has an active commute trip reduction program.

“Creating a safe trail connection would greatly improve all neighborhood business and St. Peter Hospital's ability to encourage staff to use alternate forms of transportation in order to reduce congestion in this area. This pathway would encourage residents (including the elderly) to access the trail for health and wellness benefits,” wrote Edgerton in his application.

“Whether it’s cyclists, persons with disabilities, moms pushing baby strollers or elderly people trying to access the trail, the existing trail connection poses access limitations and safety concerns.

The project received $162,000 in 2016 and the go-ahead from city council. However, the money has been sitting in the Capital Facilities Plan budget, on hold, ever since.

Asked what could happen to this funding, Michelle Swanson, city staff for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, says there are no other Neighborhood Pathways projects scheduled.

“This gives us the flexibility to reserve the funding for the Ensign Pathway for a while, in case the property owners decide to come back to the negotiating table. Were there another project in the pipeline, we probably would have moved on from building that project. 

“As we told them, we do hope they’ll come back to the table. We believe in the value of this project,” she said.

Above: John Gessner has lived at The Firs for about two and a half years. He uses a motorized scooter and must go out of his way to use alternative access points to the trail, either behind Kaiser Permanente or to the south, near Olympia Crest Apartments, along Lilly Road. He says there are five or six residents with scooters who would like to use the trail, but don't, due to the lack of safe access.


Last month, Gessner took a spill off of his scooter at the intersection of Lilly and Ensign Road. Luckily, several passersby immediately jumped out of their cars to assist him and right his scooter. He was shook up and slightly injured. Gessner wants trail access closest to the facility so he doesn’t have to use the streets to access services. I was lucky. My scooter was laying on top of me. I wouldn't have been able to get it off of me if it hadn't been for those folks.

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Case Closed: Yoos Pleads Guilty with Alford Plea


by Janine Unsoeld
www.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com

Scott Yoos, an Olympia man accused of a felony assault against a police officer, today pleaded guilty with an Alford plea to two counts, one for criminal trespass and one for obstructing a law enforcement officer.

In negotiations between Yoos, his attorney, Larry Hildes, and Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney J. Andrew Toynbee, the change in plea thus ended a 26 month ordeal for Yoos, and everyone else involved.

Yoos, 47, can hear, but cannot speak due to a head injury from a beating he suffered while hitchhiking in 1984.

On June 1, 2011, Yoos was cited for criminal trespass and obstructing justice while riding on his bicycle through Olympia at 11:30 p.m. toward his home on Martin Way. Yoos stopped to throw some dirty napkins in a Dumpster located at 2302 Fourth Avenue, near Twister Donuts, and within minutes, officers converged on Yoos. Yoos' method of communication, pen and paper, were taken away, and his attempts to communicate using sign language were interpreted by officers as violent behavior.

The case was bumped up to a felony after Olympia Police Department Sergeant Paul Johnson filed a report weeks after the situation, alleging that Yoos had kicked him during the scuffle. Yoos denies kicking Sergeant Johnson, and the alleged kick did not require medical attention.

Under the Alford plea, a defendant admits that sufficient evidence exists in which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty if a case goes to trial. Yoos is contesting the facts but agreed that the facts in the police reports are sufficient that he could be found guilty. 

After several fitful starts, interruptions, and a court recess, Yoos, through a sign language interpreter, said today that he understood the rights he would give up by pleading guilty, and that the court did not need to necessarily adhere to the recommendations of the State, represented by Toynbee.

The five page document recommended, in part, that jail time be suspended, and that a $250 crime victim fund fee and a $200 filing fee be paid.

Judge Carol Murphy presided over the status hearing, saying that the court is not required to follow the State's recommendation. In the end, she did.

Hildes, in his statement on Yoos' behalf, said that Yoos has no criminal history, cares about his community, and that Yoos' biggest concern is to make sure that changes are made in law enforcement protocols, such as the use of police video cameras.

"He's one of the best hearted people I have ever met," said Hildes.

Yoos, through an interpreter, said to the court, "This whole thing has been very draining on many levels, physically and psychologically and financially, and I feel like I can no longer afford to swim in this pool. I want to see that video is installed in all of the OPD, Olympia Police Department, patrol cars or in the uniform. This all would never have happened if I had a recording, a recorded witness, to back me up. As it is now, it is four against one and my chances in trial would not be wonderful. It's very frustrating but I would be - I will be - happy to be done with this."

Murphy said that it is the court's opinion that Mr. Yoos has been very respectful in the courtroom, and consistently on time. She said she wished she could say the same for his attorney, Mr. Hildes, who often arrived late for court appearances. Hildes lives in Bellingham. 

She added that she appreciated Mr. Yoos' difficulty in navigating the justice system and the time it has taken for everyone to come to this resolution.

A Scott Yoos Legal Defense Fund account has been set up at the Washington State Employees Credit Union. To pay Yoos' remaining expenses as a result of his case, donations to the fund may be made at any credit union branch.

OPD and the Feasibility of Patrol Car Video Cameras

Asked by this reporter late last month about the Olympia Police Department's (OPD) time and costs expended by OPD on the Yoos case specifically, Laura Wohl, OPD's spokesperson, said she could not estimate the cost. 

"The reason that costs aren’t available is that we don’t track such things by the case. For example, we track overtime according to what it is used for generically: to fill short shifts, to staff events, for court time, etc. We don’t track straight time in a case-by-case manner, either. Instead, officers work on many things during their regular shifts and the time is simply noted as regular shift hours....They may be investigating multiple cases when they are in the field, at the same time they may need to respond to an emergency call."

Asked about the department's interest in and cost of video cameras in patrol cars, she said, "Yes, the department has investigated the use of video cameras in our vehicles. The cost of the equipment is approximately $6000 each plus one-time infrastructure (antennae, computer server for storing the video, etc.) costs of about $10,000. The department has received grant funding to buy up to six cameras, although we do not have funding to equip all of our cars."
 


Asked how many patrol cars there are in Olympia's fleet, Wohl said, "We currently have 20 marked patrol vehicles assigned to patrol shifts and to our traffic unit, as well as an additional two vehicles used by field supervisors. We have another 28 vehicles (some marked, some not) that are used by detectives, administration, the jail, the volunteer program, the school resource officer program, the training program, and our evidence/crime scene investigation team."
 
Wohl added, "OPD is in favor of in-car video. We believe that it provides important information about incidents that happen in the field that helps protect both citizens and officers. We had planned to implement in-car video in 2012 with the funding we had identified. However, staffing shortages and other high-priority projects delayed implementation."
 
"Recently, court decisions have raised questions about the retention of in-car videos. Additional retention requirements may significantly impact the workload needed to manage the storage and dissemination of in-car videos. We are still assessing what resources would be required to manage the videos and whether an in-car video program is feasible," Wohl said.

For more information and several articles about Yoos' case, use the search button and use key words on this blog at ww.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com.

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Yoos Case: Motion To Dismiss Denied


Yoos Case: Motion To Dismiss Denied
By Janine Unsoeld
www.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com

The motion to dismiss a felony case against Scott Yoos, an Olympia man who is mute, was denied yesterday by Thurston County Superior Court Judge Christine Pomeroy.  
A date of August 12 has been set for the case to now go to trial with a twelve person jury.  This date could be changed if Yoos' attorney, Larry Hildes, asks for a delay to prepare for the case.
Yoos, 47, can hear, but cannot speak due to a head injury from a beating he suffered in 1984. (For more information and several articles about Yoos' case, use the search button and use key words on this blog at www.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com).

Immediately following the court's decision, Yoos motioned this reporter to come over and read what he was writing.
 
"The city of Olympia needs video cameras - I would have been entirely vindicated with a recorded witness, either on the patrol cars or attached to officer's uniforms. I've seen some very sophisticated cameras under $1,000 each."
 
Asking him what he does now, Yoos wrote, “I’ll scheme with the attorney, hopefully rest a bit.”


Case History

 
Accused of a felony assault against a police officer, Yoos was initially cited for criminal trespass and obstructing justice on June 1, 2011. On that date, Yoos was riding on his bicycle through downtown Olympia at 11:30 p.m. toward his home on Martin Way, when he stopped to throw some dirty napkins in a Dumpster located at 2302 Fourth Avenue, near Twister Donuts, in Olympia.

Within minutes, several officers converged on Yoos. Yoos’ method of communication, pen and paper, were taken away, and his attempts to communicate using sign language were interpreted by officers as violent behavior.  Yoos is 5'9 and weighs about 155 pounds.

The case was bumped up to a felony after Olympia Police Department Sergeant Paul Johnson filed a report weeks after the situation, alleging that Yoos had kicked him during the scuffle. The alleged kick did not require medical treatment. Yoos denies kicking Sergeant Johnson.

Yoos’ case has dragged on for 26 months. There have been repeated delays in the case, many of them because a court-appointed sign language interpreter was not provided or available.  Larry Hildes, his attorney, has repeatedly asked the court for a motion to dismiss the case, based on discriminatory actions by the arresting law enforcement officers.
In what has amounted to several days of actual testimony in which Yoos and three law enforcement officers involved in the case testified, Olympia Police Department officers Officer Randy Wilson, Officer S. Costello, and Officer Jason Watkins, Judge Pomeroy ruled that the officers’ actions were justified, and that they had a reasonable right to stop and detain Mr. Yoos.  She further explained that their actions were not discriminatory, citing, in the court’s opinion, that it was Mr. Yoos’ repeated attempts to leave the scene that made the situation escalate.

Hildes repeatedly argued that Yoos was unjustly arrested and silenced because the officers did not have the proper training to deal with Yoos’ disability, and, after the officers made a series of assumptions, allowed the situation to escalate.
In his closing arguments, Hildes was assertive, saying in part, "Officers are supposed to deescalate situations...It became a power struggle, respect for the officers, forcing him to do what they wanted him to do and he just wanted to communicate, that's the discrimination. But for the lack of training, experience, and policy, there would not have been an incident. Dismiss this case. But for the discriminatory result, there would be no case...."
Thurston County prosecuting attorney J. Andrew Toynbee, appearing cool and calm in his demeanor, said in his closing argument, in part, "...over three days, the officers have testified and are able to give you a reason for everything...I'm telling the court they did nothing wrong. The defendant did not wish to communicate. In fact, he kept trying to leave...when asked, he did not write his name and birthdate...they had business to conduct with him. They had a reason to talk with him...there was not a lack of training or desire to communicate...he kept trying to leave....this was a dynamic situation, things happened quickly."
Citing case law, Toynbee said that the officers had justification to take action and it had nothing to do with discrimination against Mr. Yoos.
Hildes argued that it was not a dynamic situation, that they were standing there having a written exchange until Officer Wilson intentionally took his pad of paper away, preventing Yoos from further communication.
"This was like putting a gag in his mouth, intentionally using his disability against him."
Sample Testimony
Today, two sign language interpreters were available to accommodate Yoos’ method of sign language, which is signs and finger spelling. The process is time-consuming. When changes in words occurs, it is not clear if it is Yoos changing what he is saying or if the sign language interpreter misinterpreted his finger spelling. Yoos quickly corrected the interpreter if she misinterpreted his words.

The following is a portion of an unofficial transcription as heard and written by this reporter of yesterday's testimony by Yoos, when questioned by his attorney.

Hildes: Were you trying to be uncooperative?

Yoos: No, I just wanted to go home to bed and it was a little frightening to have this armed man immediately arrest me and accuse me of something that I had not done.

Hildes: Did you attempt to communicate that to him?
Yoos: I had my communication tools all taken away from me and I was just trying to sign to them.

Hildes: Did they stop trying to communicate to you at that point?
Yoos: They were interested in arresting me and attacking me.

Moments later:
Hildes: Did you attempt to leave?

Yoos: I didn’t try to “leave” three times like Costello claims that I – no, no.
Later:

Hildes: At the time, if they had communicated with you, would you have communicated with them?
Yoos: I am not a criminal. I am a former Eagle Scout, so, and preacher’s kid. I never threatened any of the police officers.

Hildes: Was it your intention to resist them?
Yoos: No, I didn’t think it was right for them to steal my bicycle and my Walkman, my wallet, my bag and all of the papers I had in my backpack and in my pocket.

Hildes: What made you think they were stealing?
Yoos: When someone violently takes something from you, that’s stealing.

Hildes: Why did you feel like it was stealing?
Yoos: I did nothing wrong and I couldn’t communicate and it was very frustrating to me.

Hildes: Were you frightened?
Yoos: Of course – there were four armed men.

Hildes: What were you wearing – what did you have on your feet?
Yoos: I was riding my bicycle with lightweight sandals like TEVA’s but cheaper.

Hildes: And you were wearing a reflective vest, correct?
Yoos: Yes.

Hildes: So you weren’t trying to sneak into the parking lot?
Yoos: No, of course not.

Hildes: So you weren’t trying to break into the donut shop?
Yoos: Please, no.

Later:
Hildes: Did you ever attempt to resist the officers?

Yoos: I only tried to communicate with Watkins by pulling in my arms so they could not cuff me again.
Hildes: Why did you do that?

Yoos: Because I needed to tell them – I needed my voice.
Hildes: So you were just trying to communicate?

Yoos: Yes.

Later:

Hildes: What frightened you about this incident?
Yoos: I had been – I was being – unjustly arrested and accused of things which I was not guilty of and physically, and I was having armed men approaching me at night.

Hildes: Was it also because they took away your ability to communicate?
Yoos: That was very frightening and frustrating to me…it was Wilson who took the pad and my communication away.

Hildes: So the officer already did that?
Yoos: Yes.

Hildes: And you were already communicating with him about the incident when he took the pad away from you?
Yoos: Yea, briefly. There are only, like, two or three back and forth conversations.

Later:
Hildes: He could have kept on writing and you would have kept responding, right?

Yoos:  Yes.
Hildes: Did you give him any reason that you didn’t want to communicate with him?

Yoos: I just wanted to go back home….I felt threatened and harassed but I was entirely willing to write back and forth with him.

With his attorney and friends, and while seated with his interpreter during the hearing, Yoos was using a new gizmo to communicate, a little black  LCD writing tablet called a Boogie Board. One button touch erases his words between thoughts. Asked about it during a break, Yoos wrote, “It was a surprise gift from a friend’s friend who won it in a raffle and sent it to me in the mail from Texas.”
Asked how he likes it, Yoos wrote, “It’s low battery use, it’s “supposed” to go about six years. It is the bottom of the line cheapest model  - he points to the back that says it’s from www.improveelectronics.com - but it’s just what I need. A lot better from markers, cuz those are very messy and are always drying out on me. Plus, no fumes.”  Many of his friends had difficulty reading the dark blue lettering against the black board but took the time to read his writings.

Yoos looked pale and drawn. During another break, he was asked how he feels. He wrote that his red nose and sniffles was the result of allergies.

Asked how he is holding up in general, Yoos wrote, “It’s been hanging over me for 26 months with over 20 court appearances counting the city ones – s’been hellacious – I’m not able to consider adopting a pup….”
 
Interview with Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney J. Andrew Toynbee


In a telephone interview this morning with Thurston County Chief Prosecuting Attorney J. Andrew Toynbee, who has pursued and argued the case against Yoos, Toynbee was asked what happens next. 


Toynbee said the case is scheduled to go to trial and Yoos could be convicted of assault of the third degree with a sentence of one to three months in jail, acquitted, or, he could accept a plea offer to a lesser charge.

“I’m not interested in sending Mr. Yoos to jail,” said Toynbee.  “I have made several attempts for plea offers in the past but Mr. Yoos’ attorney, Larry Hildes, has not entertained them.”

Asked why Thurston County is pursuing this case, Toynbee said, “We take assaults on officers very, very seriously, that’s the reason."
Asked what he wants from Yoos, Toynbee responded, “My goal is to have Mr. Yoos take some accountability for his actions.”

Asked why Sergeant Paul Johnson, the officer who was allegedly kicked by Yoos, did not testify, Toynbee said, “The motion only focused on one issue – whether law enforcement was discriminatory in their actions. Sergeant Johnson didn’t take action, he oversaw the situation after he arrived, but he would be called to trial. He could have testified, but it (the hearing) was going on and on….”

Asked if he thinks it’s a problem that Sergeant Johnson’s report is dated weeks after the incident, (it is dated June 27), and unsigned, Toynbee said, “No, I don’t think it’s a problem. Two officers, Costello and Wilson saw it (the kick).”

Asked how much Thurston County has spent thus far on Yoos’ case, Toynbee said he is a salaried employee and doesn’t know how much has been spent.