On May 15, there will be another group meeting that will include property owners to “review and fine tune” the results of the April 5 and April 16 workshops.
Above: A birds-eye view of downtown Olympia from West Bay yesterday afternoon. Many of the properties seen above are under review by a potential city Community Renewal Area plan.
By Janine Unsoeld
An active visioning process for downtown Olympia is
well underway and almost nobody knows about it. The results of this vision for
downtown Olympia could seriously influence the built environment of downtown
Olympia.
The city council-driven Community and Economic
Revitalization Committee (CERC) was created to deal with downtown blight
through a community renewal area plan.
A citizen advisory committee was selected to advise
the committee. The 30 plus member group has been meeting on a regular basis,
fast-tracking a vision for downtown Olympia’s isthmus area, meeting several
times in the past couple months.
The public is not scheduled to be included in the
process until this coming July, when the community will be invited to comment
on just two possible downtown and isthmus-area scenarios.
Above: The ultimate vision of blight - the vacant,
nine story Capitol Center Building on 5th Avenue depicted in its own shards of
glass on the sidewalk, earlier this spring.
Local land use and shoreline management attorney
Allen Miller is a participant in the city’s citizen advisory committee for
developing a potential Community Renewal Area (CRA). He is optimistic about dealing
with the monstrosity everyone asks and wonders about: the nine-story Capitol Center
Building, best known as The Mistake on the Lake.
“I think we are very close to correcting the
greatest land use error in the history of Olympia which was allowing the
Capitol Center Building to be built in 1965 in the historic view corridor of
the Wilder and White and Olmsted Brothers plans for the State Capitol Campus. The
plan for the State Capitol Campus is recognized around the country as the
greatest example of City Beautiful Movement
architecture in the world.“The current partnership among city, county, state, tribe, and private philanthropy is leading to the purchase of the Capitol Center Building and taking it down. In 1956, Governor Arthur Langlie and Mayor Amanda Smith came up with a “Fifty Year Plan for Olympia and the Capitol,” which planned the isthmus as a great civic area. We are finally implementing that plan over 50 years later.”
Miller provided links to videos about the vision of downtown Olympia without the Capitol Center Building: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa_vNP54Hg8
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqiC5jbuPA
Parking
at Capitol Center Building/The Views on 5th Avenue/Mistake on the Lake
While the urban design workshops held on April 5 and April 16
encouraged free thinking, many participants seemed willing to outright ignore
actual comprehensive plan values, zoning, and current and ongoing legal
restrictions governing our unique shoreline features.
For example, a hard-won July 2013 hearing officer
decision definitively precludes use of the parking lot on the Capitol Center
block for any purpose related to the building. The decision has a long and
complicated history.
In 2011, the City of Olympia issued a notice of land
use approval and SEPA determination of non-significance allowing The Views to
continue with its conversion of the nine-story Capital Center Building on Fifth
Avenue from an office building into a hotel.
(To
read these and other isthmus-related stories at www.janineslittlehollywood.blogspot.com
– December 2, 2010 and February 16, 2011 type keywords into search button such
as “hotel” and “isthmus.”)
Miller successfully represented former Governor Dan
Evans and others in two years of litigation that followed, related to the
Shoreline Management Act (SMA). The Capitol Center project site actually
consists of two different land use parcels involving two parking lots located
within 200 feet of Budd Inlet, thus falling under shoreline management
regulation. In response to the threat of SMA regulation, building owners
elected to detach one parking lot from the site.
Calling it a “classic piecemealing” maneuver, the
city hearing examiners and the county’s Superior Court judges saw this as the
owner’s way of getting around the constraints the SMA would impose.
The decision by Mark Scheibmeir, City of Olympia
hearing examiner, said that the hotel or any commercial use on the project site
shall be prohibited from using the adjoining parking lots or any property
within the shoreline jurisdiction unless the owner of the property has complied
with all applicable permitting requirements of the Shoreline Management Act.
Keep that in mind as you read the next design
workshop group visioning process on April 16.
Above: From left to right - Jim Randall, Keith Stahley, Rob Richards, Stuart Drebick, Renee Sundee, and Olympia Mayor Stephen Buxbaum participate at the April 16 urban design workshop.
April 16: Sample Table Discussion/Visioning Process
Another downtown visioning opportunity was offered to the Community Economic Revitalization Committee, citizen advisory committee members and property owners on April 16 in Olympia City Hall chambers to contribute their design vision for downtown Olympia.
This was billed as a make-up session for those who could not attend the workshop on April 5. There were two tables of participants.
One table was composed of Rob Richards, Capital
Recovery Center; Stuart Drebick, West Olympia Business Association member,
contractor, and downtown property owner; Keith Stahley, city planning manager; Jim
Randall, attorney and past president of the West Olympia Business Association;
Mayor Stephen Buxbaum; and Renee Sunde of the Thurston County Economic
Development Council.
As I did for the April 5 workshop, I listened to the visioning rationale of one full conversation. This table conversation
was largely dominated by Drebick, who immediately asked Leonard Bauer, deputy director of the city planning and community development department, at the
outset of the workshop, “Are we stuck with 35 feet?”
Bauer responded, “As you look at things, note that
it’s a consensus by the group, considering the atmosphere and place that we’re
at right now.”
“So is this something that will really be built or
is it pie in the sky? The worse thing that this space can be is a park,” he
told his table group.
“Keep in mind, as housing gets built, it will bring
people downtown,” said Renee Sundee, referring to the proposed seven story Columbia Heights
project.
“I haven’t seen any dirt turned yet,” responded
Drebick.“It’ll get done,” said Buxbaum.
“I’ll believe it when I see it,” replied Drebick.
“People stop at Storman’s before they go home…a park
is nice during the summer months, but during the winter months, there’s nothing
to keep people downtown. If there was a hotel or a small convention center, that
would do it. Whether or not that can happen politically is another question,”
said Drebick.
“Structured parking someplace is key,” said Stahley.
“The Cherry Street building looks nice, all the
parking is inside the building, but they had the height to do it,” said
Drebick.
“We’ve estimated that each stall in this area would
be $40,000 - $45,000,” said Stahley.
“That’s expensive,” said Drebick.
“It will take the city pencil to make it happen,
otherwise it won’t pencil out,” said Drebick.
Discussing the building that Traditions is currently
located on Water Street, someone suggested that if it is made housing, we need
parking.
“That street is not critical – we could consider two
story parking. All those buildings are knockdowns, and we can reorient them,”
said Buxbaum.
“If Kolb keeps redeveloping his properties to
include housing over the next three to four years, that’s a lot of housing,”
mused Drebick. “Is there demand for it?” someone asked.
“Yes,” said Buxbaum.
Skeptical, Debrick said, “I’ll wait to see them rented.”
“A four story building is economical to build.
Beyond that, you get into other issues,” said Drebick.
“In your honest opinion, Mayor, about the Capitol
Center Building, are the Bob Jacobs' of the world going to allow it to be built?
Hotel or housing, that’s it for me,” said Drebick, loudly. Former Olympia mayor Bob Jacobs was standing nearby, overseeing the conversation and activities at the other table, composed of Councilmember Julie Hankins; Connie Phegley, owner of Old School Pizza; Paul Knox, executive director of the local United Way; Kevin Stormans, owner of Bayview grocery store; and Leo Rancour, of the Olympia Yacht Club.
Dodging the question, Buxbaum asked Richards, who hadn’t yet spoken, “What do you think?”
“We don’t want to get a neighborhood that’s dead at
6 p.m.,” said Richards.
“I think a boutique hotel could be very appealing.
This could be a prime area,” said Sundee, who also did not speak up much.
“If the city openly encouraged it, the hoteliers
will come. Right now, it has stink on it,” said Drebick.
Stahley said that in 2007-08, residential was
explored for the building, but no exterior balconies could be built on
it based on the way it’s constructed.
Moving to the Olympia Yacht Club, it was discussed
that the club is interested in getting off the water.
“We could have high-end housing over the Yacht Club,
but condos don’t sell in this town – they have a stigma in Olympia for some
reason…I don’t know….,” said Drebick.
Stahley introduced the dilemma on Percival Landing.
“Right now, it hangs out there. It’s protection for
sea level rise and storm surge. That allows the city to save an incredible
amount of money in concrete for a seawall…” Stahley explained that the state
Department of Natural Resources leases its land behind Bayview to the Yacht
Club.
“They park trailers and stuff there.”
Sundee encouraged a retail, storefront experience
along Fourth Avenue.
“Yes, that’s what we want,” said Stahley.
“I’d love to encourage something like that,” said
Buxbaum, as he proceeded to place red-colored chips representing retail along
the backside of Bayview.
“You mean reorientation?” asked Stahley.
“There’s your park,” said Drebick, as he plopped a
green colored park chip onto the ImageSource building, formerly the Kentucky
Fried Chicken. “That guy said he’s not attached to the building,” Debrick said,
referring to building owner Vicktor Zvirzdys.
“Connect Percival Landing, because there’s not a lot
of places for people to watch the salmon…I think that’s just dynamite!” said
Drebick.
“What about a mid-rise building?” asked Sundee.
“Thirty five feet is not mid-rise,” said Drebick.
Stahley said, “Well, a park needs parking,” and
rearranged the red chips.
Drebick, who was still talking about the extension
of Percival Landing and being near the water, continued, “It’s good to go smell
it, feel life and death….”
Buxbaum put down some green space.
Sharp-eyed Drebick said, “Is that more park?”
“Yea,” replied Buxbaum.
Buxbaum started encroaching on the current street
between the Capitol Center Building and the Heritage Park fountain block, saying, “Don’t restrict yourselves
to the gridlines.”
“It’s very expensive to develop unless you get
density,” protested Drebick. “There’s too much bad dirt. The Westside has good
dirt.”
Stahley said that back in the 80s it was suggested
that Storman’s raise the height of their building.
“They didn’t have a color that says hotel?” Sundee asked Drebick, as he cut up a piece of yellow paper, wrote HOTEL on it, and plopped it down.
Drebick laughed. “Yea, what does that say to you?”
So, using a bit of rock, paper, scissors psychology, Drebick
single-handedly converted the nine story Capitol Center Building, aka, the Mistake on the Lake,
into a hotel.
And there it sat until time for the evening’s
project was drawing to a close, and Buxbaum could stand it no longer.
The discussion finally turned to the hotel/Mistake
on the Lake and a suggestion was made by Buxbaum that the building, in some
form, be the location for a new library. The idea was instantly rejected by Drebick.
Above: Stuart Drebick created his vision for a hotel on the isthmus, and there it sat until Mayor Stephen Buxbaum could stand it no longer, and suggested that the building, in some form, be the location for a new library.
“People who go to the library are not people with
money, to be blunt. Do we not all carry a library in our pockets?” as he pulled
out his smartphone.
“The library has some of the best programming in
town,” retorted Stahley.
“It’s the only place for a library and it would
require a community compromise,” continued Buxbaum. “I can see taking down the
building and putting up a four story building…it’s a building past its useful
life. It’s dysfunctional.”
“A library isn’t a revenue producer,” said Sundee.
“Where the library is now is underused,” said
Buxbaum.
Drebick did not think it belonged downtown.
“A library creates foot traffic – it’s a big plus
because it’s a self-supporting facility. Make it a civic center that’s
exquisitely beautiful,” said Buxbaum.
“Who pays for it?” someone said.
“A coalition between those who want to get rid of it
and those who want a library. It’s a large number of people,” responded
Buxbaum.
“OK, well, that’s the politics of this town,”
sniffed Drebick.
“If you combine retail and commercial, and some
amenities….” someone said.
“I can’t climb on that boat,” said Drebick.
Randall said that the downtown library is creepy.
“What about something like a Powell’s bookstore?”
offered Sundee, referring to the awesome Portland shop.
“You have to think of highest and best use, where
you’re getting true financial benefit,” said Randall.
“A library gives families three things: someplace to
take the kids, a place to go out to eat and shop, get groceries, exercise and
entertain, all within the space,” said Buxbaum, motioning to the general area.
“It would take you more than 10 years to pull
together a plan for a library,” said Drebick.
“I don’t know,” responded Buxbaum.
Drebick began to estimate the costs to get rid of
the building and redevelop it into a library. Estimates started at $20 million.
“That’s conservative,” said Randall.
Discussion ensued about creating the top three
floors into condos, with the library underneath.
“I don’t think people would like living above a
library,” said Sundee.
Buxbaum explained that the City of White Center
created just such a project and that it appears to be a successful model.
Drebick said that he sat on a committee in 1987 for
housing and not a lot has changed. “Same issues: Does it pencil? Can you rent
it? Will it make money?”
Wrapping up the April 16 workshop, Buxbaum
concluded, “There are choices to make, options with very little public
investment, explain to the public what a return on investment means, test the
feasibility and come up with a range of options worthy of consideration.”
Discussion
by the Community and Economic Revitalization Committee
The CERC committee met on April 21 to discuss the results
of the two design workshops and figure out next steps.
“Property ownership, financing, developers, and the community - how does this all fit together so it’s achievable? Just because there’s property ownership does not mean there’s development,” began Stahley.
Jones said that out of the isthmus discussions and
workshops, sea level rise was not discussed.“Property ownership, financing, developers, and the community - how does this all fit together so it’s achievable? Just because there’s property ownership does not mean there’s development,” began Stahley.
“Regarding its impact to the isthmus, I think we
need something of a reality check….blowing up bladders, creating berms, I have
no idea of the magnitude. Bringing it into the discussions sooner makes sense….putting
Percival Landing - millions of dollars - over the water doesn’t make sense,”
said Jones.”
Stahley agreed. Discussing the Oyster House, Stahley
said that there’s not too much the city can do to protect it.
“It’s one of the most challenging areas, how to
protect it.”
Stahley said that addressing the issues of Percival
Landing and sea level rise issues are currently underfunded.
Next
Steps
Economic feasibility involving fiscal issues,
revenues, property taxes, and costs associated with the design workshop ideas is scheduled to
be presented to the group in May.
The consultant will soon be distilling the visions
created by the eight tables of participants and creating a computer model to refine common
themes and areas of disagreement.
On May 15, there will be another group meeting that
will include property owners, says Stahley, to “review and fine tune” the
results of the April 5 and April 16 workshops.
On May 29, the Community and Economic Revitalization
Committee (CERC) will meet to discuss this input and the scenarios developed.
Also at the May 29 meeting, the CERC will consider next steps and develop a
recommendation for the full city council to consider on June 10.
Next: Part Three: Fast Tracking a Vision for Downtown Olympia under a Community Renewal Area Plan - More Participant Perspectives
Above: Amongst broken glass, graffiti, and discarded toilet paper, two daffodils try their best to keep up appearances outside the vacant Capitol Center Building on 5th Avenue in downtown Olympia earlier this spring.
